• Users Online: 225
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 34-40

Furcation involvement: Still a dilemma


Department of Periodontology, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Center, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication30-Jun-2017

Correspondence Address:
Zoya Chowdhary
Department of Periodontology, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Center, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijmd.ijmd_64_16

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Advances in dentistry, as well as the increased desire of patients to maintain their dentition, have led to treatment of teeth that once would have been thought to be removed; as furcally involved teeth present unique challenges to the success of periodontal therapy. The treatment, management, and long-term retention of molar teeth exhibiting furcation invasions, always have been a challenge to the discerning general dentist or dental specialist. Anatomically and morphologically complicating factors dictate modifications in treatment approaches used for managing these areas. This review evaluates the different aspects of furcation in terms of etiology, classification, diagnosis, and various treatment possibilities. This review evaluates the different aspects of furcation in terms of aetiology, classification, diagnosis and various treatment possibilities.

Keywords: Furcation; furcation involvement; periodontal disease; plaque


How to cite this article:
Chowdhary Z, Mohan R. Furcation involvement: Still a dilemma. Indian J Multidiscip Dent 2017;7:34-40

How to cite this URL:
Chowdhary Z, Mohan R. Furcation involvement: Still a dilemma. Indian J Multidiscip Dent [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 May 22];7:34-40. Available from: http://www.ijmdent.com/text.asp?2017/7/1/34/209278


  Background Top


Periodontal disease may be defined as “Inflammation of the supporting tissues of the teeth. Usually, a progressively destructive change leads to loss of bone and periodontal ligament. An extension of inflammation from gingiva into the adjacent bone and ligament,”[1] is affected by age, gender, ethnicity, income, social class, and educational status. The degree to which a lesion progresses is affected by several factors; such as inflammatory response, type of bacteria present, and local factors which cause plaque accumulation. In the posterior segments of dentition, the progress of the inflammatory periodontal disease, if unabated, ultimately results in attachment loss sufficient enough to affect the bifurcation or trifurcation of multi-rooted teeth and this is one of the most serious sequels of periodontitis.[2] Furcation maybe defined as the anatomic area of a multi-rooted tooth where the roots diverge.[3] It has a complex anatomic morphology that may be difficult or impossible to debride during routine periodontal instrumentation, and routine home care methods also may not keep the furcation area free of plaque.[4] “Furcation involvement may be defined as the invasion of the bifurcation and trifurcation of multirooted teeth by periodontal disease.”[5] Involvement of the furcae in multi-rooted teeth by chronic periodontitis is a common event resulting from loss of bone adjacent to and within the furcae.

Some authors recommended extraction of the teeth with furcation invasions rather than trying to retain them.[6] Long-term studies on treated periodontal patients have reported that molar teeth with prior furcation involvement were the most frequently lost teeth, probably because of their complex anatomy. Nevertheless, these same studies showed that in the majority of patients who responded well to treatment, many molar teeth with furcation involvement were retained for periods as long as 40–50 years.[5]

Furcation involvement, therefore, presents both diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas.[2] Nevertheless, conservation of natural dentition has been the aim of periodontics since time immemorial. So, the author through this article describes the various treatment modalities available for the clinicians to treat it.


  Etiology Top


The etiology of furcation involvement maybe classified into three major groups.[6]

  1. Primary factor
  2. Predisposing factors
  3. Contributing factors.


The primary factor includes bacterial plaque, which is the most common etiologic factor. The various predisposing factors include location relative to cementoenamel junction (CEJ), root trunk length, root length, root form, interradicular dimension, furcation shape, location of entrance, furcation entrance diameter, facial and lingual radicular bone, enamel projections, enamel pearls, bifurcation ridges, root concavities, and carious lesions. The contributing factors include plaque-associated inflammation, trauma from occlusion, pulpal pathology, vertical root fractures, and iatrogenic factors.[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13]


  Classification Top


Several systems have been devised to classify the severity of furcation involvement based either on the extent of horizontal probing depth into the furcation defect or on the vertical extent of the loss of alveolar bone within the defect. Out of the various classifications listed in [Table 1]; Glickman's classification [Figure 1] is most frequently used by the dentists in day-to-day practice.
Table 1: Classification of furcation involvement

Click here to view
Figure 1: Glickman's classification of furcation defects. (a) Grade I furcation defect, (b) Grade II furcation defect, (c) Grade III furcation defect, and (d) Grade IV furcation defect

Click here to view


Glickman's (1953) classification of Furcation involvement;

  • Grade I furcation involvement is an early/ incipient stage in which there is a suprabony pocket with no radiographic changes and only soft tissue is affected
  • Grade II furcation involvement may affect one or more furcation areas, it is a cul-de-sac lesion with a horizontal component. It may be further divided into early or advanced depending upon the extent of horizontal probing
  • Grade III, the bone is absent in the dome of the furca but clinically early lesions are covered by the soft tissue, making it not visible to the clinician, to avoid errors the furcation area should be probed from both directions and the measurements should be added to confirm.
  • Grade IV furcation involvement there is an interdental bone loss, furcation area is clinically visible because of the soft tissue recession making a through and through the tunnel from one aspect of the tooth surface to another. Once the diagnosis of the grade of furcation involvement is made, management of the furcation involvement is the next step.[2],[5] Lindhe (1983) classification of furcation involvement;
  • Grade I: Loss of inter radicular bone less than or equal to 1/3rd the horizontal tooth width
  • Grade II: Loss of inter radicular bone greater 1/3rd tooth width but not through and through.
  • Grade III: Through and through loss of inter radicular bone.


Tarnow & Fletcher (1984) classification of furcation involvement;

Based on vertical component each grade of furcation was divided into 3 subgroups depending on the distance between the bottom of the defect to roof of the furcation.

  • Subgroup A: 1-3mm
  • Subgroup B: 4-6mm
  • Subgroup C: >7mm



  Diagnosis Top


The presence of furcation-involved teeth in a periodontal patient will influence the treatment plan.[14] The selection of procedures to be used in the treatment of periodontal disease at multi-rooted teeth can first be made when the presence and depth of furcation lesions have been assessed. A thorough clinical examination is the key to diagnosis and treatment planning.[2]

  1. Clinical Assessment
  2. Probing: Buccal and lingual furcation can be easily probed. Proximal furcations are difficult for probing particularly when broad contacts are present in adjacent teeth.[14] Nabers Probe and Columbia curette 4R/4 L are used for probing the furcation area
  3. Bone Sounding or Transgingival probing: It may aid in the diagnosis of furcation defects more accurately determining the underlying bone contours [10]
  4. Radiographic Assessment.


As a general rule, bone loss is always greater than it appears in the radiograph but it.

Must always be obtained to confirm findings made during probing of a furcation-involved tooth. The radiographic examination includes intraoral periapical radiographs and vertical “bitewing” radiographs for detection of furcation invasion. In the radiographs, the location of the interdental bone, as well as the bone level within the root complex, should be examined.[14] Additional radiographs with different angles of orientation of the central beam should be used to identify bone loss within the root complex.[10]

Other than radiographs; computed tomography (CT) scan, cone beam CT, ultrasound, dental endoscope, etc., are also nowadays being used for detection.

Diagnosing furcation invasion is, therefore, best accomplished using a combination of radiographs, periodontal probing with a curved explorer or Nabers probe and bone sounding.[15]

Differential diagnosis

  • Endo-perio lesions [14]
  • Trauma from occlusion.



  Management Top


Treatment of a bony defect in the furcation region is intended to meet two objectives:[14]

  • Elimination of the microbial plaque from the exposed surfaces of the root complex
  • Establishment of an anatomy of the affected surfaces that facilitates proper self-performed plaque control.


Factors to be considered for successful treatment of furcation involvement:[2],[9] [Table 2][14]
Table 2: Factors to consider in treatment of furcation-involved molars

Click here to view


  1. Degree of Involvement
  2. Crown: Root ratio
  3. Length of roots
  4. Root anatomy/morphology
  5. Degree of root separation
  6. Strategic value of the tooth
  7. Residual tooth mobility
  8. Need for endodontic treatment
  9. Prosthetic requirements
  10. Periodontal condition of adjacent teeth
  11. Ability to maintain oral hygiene
  12. Quality of bone/ability to place implants
  13. Financial considerations
  14. Long-term prognosis.


The treatment of furcation involvement according to different classification is shown in [Table 3].
Table 3: Treatment options according to various classifications

Click here to view



  Scaling and Root Planning Top


Scaling and planing of the root surfaces in the furcation entrance of a degree I involvement in most situations result in the resolution of the inflammatory lesion in the gingiva;[14] and it is also the preliminary phase of oral rehabilitation before proceeding with surgical correction of periodontal abnormalities.[2] Healing will re-establish a normal gingival anatomy with the soft tissue properly adapted to the hard tissue walls of the furcation entrance.[14] These procedures result in the elimination of pocket, resolution of inflammation, and repair of the periodontal ligament and adjacent bone margins.


  Root Resection and Hemisection Top


Root resection is a technique for maintaining a portion of a diseased or injured molar by removal of one or more of its roots.[14] It may be achieved by hemisection, in which the splitting of a two-rooted tooth into two separate portions,[2] or by root amputation, in which only a root or two are amputed from the rest of the tooth. Hemisection has been called bicuspidizationor separation as it changes the molar into two separate tooth structure, where the furca area is changed to an interproximal space, where the tissue is more manageable by the patient.[2]

Which root to remove [Table 4]
Table 4: Root respective treatment possibilities in molars with furcation involvement

Click here to view


  • Remove the root(s) that will eliminate the furcation and allow the production of a maintainable architecture on the remaining roots [2]
  • Remove the root with the greatest amount of bone and attachment loss. Teeth with uniform advanced horizontal bone loss are not candidates for root resection [14]
  • Remove the root that best contributes to the elimination of periodontal problems on adjacent teeth [14]
  • Remove the root with the greatest number of anatomic problems [2]
  • Remove the root that least complicates future periodontal maintenance.[14]


Indications for tooth resection

  1. Periodontal Indications [16]


    • Severe vertical bone loss involving only one root of multi-rooted teeth
    • Through and through furcation destruction
    • Unfavorable proximity of roots of adjacent teeth, preventing adequate hygiene maintenance in proximal areas
    • Severe root exposure due to dehiscence.


  2. Endodontic and Restorative Indications:[16]


    • Prosthetic failure of abutments within a splint
    • Endodontic failure
    • Vertical fracture of one root
    • Severe destructive process.


  3. Prosthodontics Indications:[16]


    • Severe root proximity inadequate for a proper embrasure closure
    • Root trunk fracture or decay with the invasion of the biological width.


Contraindications to root resection and separation treatment

  1. General contraindications to periodontal surgery [17]


    • Systemic factors
    • Poor oral hygiene.


  2. Factors associated with local anatomy [17]


    • Fused roots
    • Unfavorable tissue architecture.


  3. Endodontic factors [17]


    • Retained root endodontically untreatable
    • Excessive endodontic instrumentation of retained roots
    • Excessive deepening of pulp chamber floor.


  4. Restorative factors [17]


    • Internal root decay
    • Presence of a cemented post in the remaining root.


  5. Strategic considerations [17]


    • Consider adjacent teeth available for conventional prosthetic restoration
    • Consider removable prosthesis
    • Consider implants.



  Therapeutic Protocol Top


A complete medical and dental history, thorough clinical and radiographic evaluations including periapical radiographs, diagnostic casts, and consultation with the dentist should be carried out.[18] The procedure of root resection is illustrated in [Figure 2].[2]
Figure 2: Distobuccal root resection of a maxillary first molar (a) preoperative bony contours with Grade II buccal furcation and a creater between the first and second molar (b) removal of bone from the facial of the distobuccal root and exposure of the furcation for instrumentation (c) oblique section that separates the distal root from the mesial and palatal roots of the molar (d) more horizontal section that may be used on a vital root amputation as it exposes less of the pulp of the tooth (e) areas of application of instruments to elevate the sectioned root (f) final contours of the resection

Click here to view



  Furcationplasty Top


It is a resective treatment modality which should lead to the elimination of the interradicular defect. Tooth substance is removed (odontoplasty) and the alveolar bone crest is remodeled (osteoplasty) at the level of the furcation entrance. Furcationplasty is used mainly at buccal and lingual furcations, proximal surfaces, access is often too limited for this treatment. Care must be exercised when odontoplasty is performed on vital teeth. Excessive removal of tooth structure will enhance the risk for increased root sensitivity.[14]


  Tunneling Top


Tunnel preparation is a technique used to treat deep furcation defects in mandibular molars. This type of resective therapy can be offered at mandibular molars which have a short root trunk, a wide separation angle and long divergence between the mesial and distal root. The procedure includes the surgical exposure and management of the entire furcation area of the affected molar.[14]

The furcation area is widened by the removal of some of the interradicular bone. The flaps are apically positioned to the surgically established interradicular and interproximal bone level. During maintenance, the exposed root surfaces should be treated by topical application of chlorhexidine digluconate and fluoride varnish. This surgical procedure should be used with caution because there is a pronounced risk for root sensitivity and carious lesions developing on the denuded root surfaces within artificially prepared tunnels.[4]


  Open Flap Debridement and Root Conditioning Top


Nonsurgical approach to therapy is very efficient but is also known to have therapeutic limitations. Factors that contribute to the decreased effectiveness of nonsurgical therapy include; time constraints, difficulty in accessing the area to be treated, operator experience, individual responses to the therapy by the patient, and anatomical and microbiological influences. For these reasons, it may be advantageous and indicated to have surgical access to the area in need of decontamination. The possibility to elevate a flap and visualize the roots surfaces allows for an accurate and complete elimination of local etiologic factors.


  Extraction Top


It is indicated when the destruction of the periodontium has progressed to such a level that no tooth can be preserved. Extraction may also be performed when the maintenance of the affected tooth will not improve the overall treatment or when treatment of the furcation involved tooth will not result in conditions which can be properly maintained by self-performed plaque control measure.


  Restorative Management Top


In the prosthetic preparation of the roots, the preparation margins are supragingival, which improves the precision of the definitive crown restoration. The framework of the restoration must be rigid to compensate for the compromised abutments (roots) with a compromised periodontal tissue support. The occlusion should be designed to minimize the infliction of lateral deflective forces.[14] Hemisected teeth should not be cantilevered unless supported by splinting.

Endodontic therapy should be conservative (minimal enlargement of the root canal) for root strength and condensation should not be excessive. Badly, broken-down teeth may be built up with a post and core before final restoration is attempted.[19]


  Regeneration Top


The possibility of regenerating and closing a furcation defect has been investigated. Following an early case Report by Gottlow et al. 1986, where histologic documentation of new attachment formation in human furcation defects treated by “guided tissue regeneration” therapy was provided. Since then several investigations were undertaken and the results interpreted were significant in many cases.[14]

Furcation defects with deep two-walled or significant three-walled components may, however, be candidates for regeneration procedures. These vertical bony deformities respond favorably to a variety of other surgical procedures such as debridement with or without membranes and bone grafts.[2]

Regeneration of new bone, cementum, and periodontal ligament is considered one of the primary objectives of periodontal therapy and has been demonstrated by numerous therapeutic grafting modalities for restoring periodontal osseous defects have been investigated. Bone graft materials are generally evaluated based on their osteogenic, osteoinductive osteoconductive nature.

Autografts in the form of osseous coagulum, bone blend, and marrow have been most promising for bone induction and regeneration of lost tissues. Osseous coagulum and bone utilizing intraoral cancellous bone and marrow grafts exhibit some lack of predictability in restoring furcation lesions. Iliac autografts have yielded the best potential for osseous regeneration. Despite a promise of high predictability for success, the use of iliac autografts has been reserved, possibly because of the need for additional surgical intervention, expense of procurement, and a significant incidence of root resorption.

Recently, bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs), emdogain, chorion membrane, amnion membrane, Alloderm, PRFs, etc., are being used in the regenerative procedures. Stem cells have also been used for the treatment of furcation defects, but little work has been done in this regard.


  Conclusion Top


Successful treatment, management, and long-term retention of multi-rooted teeth with periodontal destruction of varying degrees into their furcations have long been a challenge to the discerning general dentist or dental specialist. Indeed, some earlier authors have reported that periodontal pockets that involve the domes of furcations of multi-rooted teeth present a hopeless or at best an unfavorable prognosis and should be extracted. However, long-term studies of treated teeth with furcations have shown impressive on retention for up to 50 years.

Complicated though it may sound, yet furcation involvement is a commonly encountered problem in day-to-day periodontal practice. The management of furcation involvement should include a selection of appropriate treatment modality from the array of treatment options available. Preserving natural dentition, a functional natural dentition rather should be the goal of our practice.

The key to long-term success appears to be “thorough diagnosis, selection of patient with good oral hygiene and careful surgical and restorative management.”

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
The American Academy of Periodontology. Glossary of Periodontal Terms. 4th ed. Chicago, IL, USA: 2001. p. 39.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ammons WF Jr., Harrington GW. Furcation: The problem and its management. In: Newman MG, Takei HH, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA, editors. Carranza's Clinical Periodontology. 10th ed. Missouri: WB Saunders Co.; 2009. p. 911-1004.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
The American Academy of Periodontology. Glossary of Periodontal Terms. 4th ed. Chicago, IL, USA: 2001. p. 20.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Hamp SE, Nyman S, Lindhe J. Periodontal treatment of multirooted teeth. Results after 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 1975;2:126-35.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Carranza FA. Bone loss and patterns of bone destruction. In: Newman MG, Takei HH, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA, editors. Carranza's Clinical Periodontology. 10th ed. Missouri: WB Saunders Co.; 2009. p. 462.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Leonard Harold J. Indications for the removal of teeth from the standpoints of oral diagnosis and periodontia. Dent Cosm 1931;73:390-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Svärdström G, Wennström JL. Furcation topography of the maxillary and mandibular first molars. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:271-5.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Bower RC. Furcation morphology relative to periodontal treatment. Furcation entrance architecture. J Periodontol 1979;50:23-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Al-Shammari KF, Kazor CE, Wang HL. Molar root anatomy and management of furcation defects. J Clin Periodontol 2001;28:730-40.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Müller HP, Eger T. Furcation diagnosis. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26:485-98.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Hou GL, Tsai CC. Types and dimensions of root trunk correlating with diagnosis of molar furcation involvements. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:129-35.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Roussa E. Anatomic characteristics of the furcation and root surfaces of molar teeth and their significance in the clinical management of marginal periodontitis. Clin Anat 1998;11:177-86.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Goldman HM, Cohen WD. Infrabony pocket: Classification and treatment. J Periodontol 1958;29:272-80.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Carnevale G, Pontoriero R, Lindhe J, editors. Treatment of furcation-involved teeth. In: Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry. 4th ed. Iowa: Blackwell Munksgaard Co.; 1997. p. 683-710.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Kalkwarf KL, Reinhardt RA. The furcation problem. Current controversies and future directions. Dent Clin North Am 1988;32:243-66.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Weine FS. Endodontic Therapy. 6th ed. Missouri, USA: Mosby Inc.; 2004. p. 423-51.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Basaraba N. Root amputation and tooth hemisection. Dent Clin North Am 1969;13:121-32.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Carnevale G, Pontoriero R, Hürzeler MB. Management of furcation involvement. Periodontol 2000 1995;9:69-89.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Parihar AS, Kotoch V. Furcation involvement and its treatment: A review. J Adv Med Dent Sci Res 2015;3:81-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Background
Etiology
Classification
Diagnosis
Management
Scaling and Root...
Root Resection a...
Therapeutic Protocol
Furcationplasty
Tunneling
Open Flap Debrid...
Extraction
Restorative Mana...
Regeneration
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3453    
    Printed108    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded15    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]